The sports I enjoy watching in the Olympics are the unusual ones, the ones you don’t get to see everyday. And it doesn’t come any more unusual than synchronised swimming.

Lots of people tend to make fun of synchronised swimming. Possibly because of all they know of the sport is pictures like this:

Some say it’s not a real sport and even laugh at the athletes who compete in it. Those people either haven’t ever seen the sport performed, or they’re just mean-spirited haters. Today I got to watch it for the first time and I can tell you: it was a treat.

The main thing I learned about synchronised swimming is obvious when you think about it: it’s crazy hard. I say “obvious when you think about it” because it doesn’t occur to you right away, the athletes make it look so easy!

Consider the strength needed to lift your body that far out of the water, and the core strength needed to keep your legs upright and controlled. The athletes are not allowed to touch the floor at all, especially when one has to launch the other into a jump.

Each of the precise movements is exactly synchronised, but there is no time to carefully align them – each happens in rapid succession. This year the camera angles were really amazing, not just one above and one below water, but also a camera on the waterline across the pool (so it’s not affected by the splashes) can show the athlete’s entire body both above and below water.

You can see the proverbial duck’s legs paddling below the water – all the hard work needed to give the show of apparent effortlessness above the water. Even then, their immense strength means that even below the water they are often almost synchronised. The crazy thing I keep thinking about is how they hold their breath for so long! And when they do get a breath it is as they complete a fast, complicated above-water sequence, while controlling their facial expressions. They do such intense exercise with very limited breath… I’m exhausted just watching!


The women really do look like they belong in the water. My favourite moves are those too fast for your mind to understand how they did it before they’ve moved on to the next. Long, shiny legs move gracefully and powerfully, a sleek head and beautiful smile, then a splash and suddenly all has disappeared. At times, the athletes really look like water sprites!

I watched the “duets” (2 ladies) “free routines” which means that they can choose any music and any choreography and they’ve got 3.5minutes to show off as many skills as they can. This was pretty choice since it meant each routine was really different. My favourites were Italy, Spain, China, Russia and Canada.

Spain had really intense, flamenco-inspired moves, with matching slick black hair and red-flowered uniforms.

At the beginning of their routine each duo walks up (in freakish unison) onto a deck over the pool. Many choose to strike a stunning pose before a whistle is blown, their music starts and they have 10 seconds to enter the pool. This time on the deck is often used to set the tone and show the theme for the routine to follow. Here is the Spanish duet’s pose in the European Champs (I couldn’t find a pic of their Olympic one):

Sexy, non?

With the help of the commentator I could tell that the best routines were those that had “contrast” – fast intense bits and slow, subtle bits. I really liked the drama that was created when the moves matched the well-chosen music and how this often reflected the teams’ country of origin.

This theatricality was enhanced by the sparkly beautiful (and sometimes zany) costumes, complete with hairpieces (prickling with approximately ten million bobby pins to hold them in throughout the routine) and sometimes quite pronounced makeup. Each of these elements enhances the theme of the performance and while some may look really extreme, the commentators reminded us that it’s just like stage makeup – it’s for the benefit not only of the judges but those spectators way up in the stands.

It’s pretty shocking, then, to see the athletes without their getup.

These lovely ladies are Canadian synchronised swimmers Elise Marcotte and Marie-Pier Boudreau-Gagnon. They did their pre-Games training in utter secrecy in Spain, before revealing their comedy-themed routine yesterday.

Their theme was the English tradition of the Court Jester, complete with jester-hat themed hair pieces. Their music was kooky and filled with crazy, echo-y (almost creepy) laughter and comedic sound effects perfectly timed to match the swimmers’ movements – like a crazy “boing” springing noise as a single leg sprang from the water. Lots of their leg movements were wild, flapping around like manic Punch n’ Judy puppets, except that they were both perfectly in time. I liked the inclusion of humourous moves and also kind of slight-of-hand (and leg) movements that kept it so entertaining. (Is that a leg? Where’d that arm come from? Whose hand is that?)

Again, the underwater view reminds you that they’re upside-down for half of their routine. The stamina required to complete the 3.5 minute routine is considerable.

They looked like they were really having fun and the whole thing was really clever. One of the final moves involved one of the swimmers hitting the other on the head with an invisible club – Punch ‘n Judy styles – so that she made a crazy facial expression and sank beneath the water. Love!

Another really memorable duet was the Russians Natalia Ishchenko and Romashina Svetlana. Their theme was dolls – made obvious from their opening pose and clockwork movements on deck à la ‘Chitty Chitty Bang Bang’. Their uniforms were quite distinctive, too, with two slightly-spooky dolls on the front and their hair in childlike pink buns and a big pink bow.

Their movements were fun and childlike with apparently effortless flips, but also precise and exact in their clockwork-ness.

The obvious fun they brought to their routine was obvious and some of the moves were really cheeky. A lot of the teams used exaggerated facial expressions to match their music – not just the static, manic smiles we think of in synchronised swimming.

One team who’s theme was a little more “out there” was the duet from Brazil, Nayara Figueira and Lara Teixeira. Their theme was the Human Body and I really liked their soundtrack but their costumes were quite… different. They featured red and blue bedazzled, quite anatomically detailed, arteries, veins and a heart on the front, a sparkly gold skeleton torso and pelvis on the back, and a whole swimming cap embroidered like a brain. Yup. Different.

But they rocked it with their pearly whites. And their airtime.

One of the top teams in the competition, along with Russia, Spain and Canada were the Chinese duet of Xuechen Huang and Ou Liu. Like the Spanish, their theme was clear from the outset and was obviously inspired by their national culture.

You’ve heard of spirit fingers? Well the Chinese duet have dragon fingers! I thought it was a really cool motif throughout their routine and it really set them apart and gave them their own flavour.

Uniform-wise I also really liked the duet from Kazakhstan’s and also the Australians’. I loved the music and choreography of the Spanish, Italian and Japanese duets. Definitely looking forward to the finals tomorrow! Medals are tipped to go to 1st Russia, 2nd and 3rd China and Spain. I’d really like it if Italy could somehow get up there, too.

Maggie Hendricks has also written a great post entitled Wolves and Torches and Broadway Songs: Why You Need To Watch Synchronised Swimming.

Scandal Lvl: Olympic

So just a few days in and already, as with any events of this scale, there have been some scandals – or perhaps “controversies” is a better word – at these Olympics.

First of all there was that mysterious woman who entered with the Indian team during the Parade of Nations but who was not part of the Indian contingent. Brazenly she walked right at the head of the team next to the flagbearer. Rumours were rife – had she bragged about her press pass on Facebook before the event? Who was she? What was she doing?

The Indians are understandably upset, with the acting chef de mission of the delegation Brig. P K Muralidharan Raja pointing out

The Indian contingent was shown for hardly 10 seconds in the TV coverage, and the entire focus sadly was on this lady instead of the athletes.

Apparently graduate student Madhura Nagendra was a volunteer involved in the ceremony who was told to quietly slip back into the stadium with the Indian team. …Fail!

Another Olympic controversy was caused not by a person or people but rather by the lack of people. Anyone watching the Olympics on TV must have noticed the number of empty seats at so many (even most) of the “sold out” events. With so many supporters clamouring for tickets, it’s not a good look to have half-empty stadiums.

With most of the tickets supposedly for sale to the public, a large number are reserved for media and press, Olympic officials, and athletes not competing in that event, who may decide not to show up.  Apparently many of the tickets were those allocated to foreign vendors who simply didn’t want to pay to return the unsold tickets.

It’s not a good look and Olympic officials and UK politicians alike are becoming increasingly frustrated.

While the Olympics are all about sportswomanship, achieving personal bests and setting records, one young woman sparked controversy when she did just that in the swimming pool. Ye Shiwen’s shock upset in the woman’s 400m medley is big news. Not just because she won, but the way that she came from behind and in 25m was a body length ahead of the next swimmer. She created not just a new world record of 4m 28.43s, but in doing so the 16-year-old Chinese girl beat the time of her male counterpart, 27-year-old American Ryan Lochte for the last 50m (the two lengths of freestyle). She also beat her own previous best by 5 seconds.

The controversy came, however, with the speed with which the doping question was inferred by the BBC commentator Clare Balding.  Just minutes after the race she asked

How many questions will there be, Mark, about somebody who can suddenly swim so much faster than she has ever swum before?

A storm erupted online with those defending Shiwen and those protesting that the drug question was justified considering the extraordinary circumstances. Olympic Village Deputy Mayor Duncan Goodhew is quoted as saying

I think it is very destructive and very irresponsible of anybody to accuse people until they are proven guilty.

The head of anti-doping at China’s General Administration of Sport, Jiang Zhixue reportedly stated

The Chinese athletes, including the swimmers, have undergone nearly 100 drug tests since they arrived here. Many were also tested by the international federations and the British anti-doping agency. … I think it is not proper to single Chinese swimmers out once they produce good results. … We never questioned Michael Phelps when he bagged eight gold medals in Beijing.

The Telegraph‘s Paul Hayward wrote an interesting article on the whole incident, “too fast for her own good in the swimming pool“.

(P.S. How cute is Shiwen?? XD)

Another woman who has been surrounded by uninvited controversy is joduka (judo fighter) Wojdan Shaherkani of Saudi Arabia, who was told that wearing a hijab was banned during competition for safety reasons. 16-year-old Wojdan was considering withdrawing and not competing at all if the ban was upheld. As you can imagine, controversy ensued.

Happily, common sense has since prevailed and a compromise has been reached with specially designed Islamic-compliant headgear being commissioned.

One really heart-breaking controversy was the fencing timing debacle at the end of the women’s épée semi-final between South Korean Shin A-lam and German Britta Heidermann. At the end of the match A-lam thought she’d won when the clock hit zero and the score was 5-5, because she had “priority” meaning that she was the winner in such a situation. However the clock was reset to one second amid vehement protests from the South Korean coach. Somehow during that second Britta scored a hit which apparently gave her the win. A distraught A-lam wept and declined to leave the piste, believing that to do so would jeopardize her appeal.

Amid slow-claps and jeers from the audience, A-lam waited, weeping, for 75 minutes (delayed the two medal competitions) before Britta’s win was upheld and she was escorted from the piste by two officials. Just minutes later she had to return to fight for bronze, which she lost 11-15 to world number one Sun Yujie.

Afterwards, through an interpreter A-lam said,

I think it’s unfair. The one second was over – I should have won. The hour was really difficult, but I thought if I got a yellow card [for leaving the piste] I might not be able to fight for bronze. I’m very sorry for the spectators. They spent a lot of money and I just don’t understand how this could have happened.

In the aftermath, Korean Olympic Committee President Park Yong-sung has stated,

I spoke to the FIE today. They never expected this kind of thing to happen in the last second, three attacks. Their timekeeping machine is only in seconds, not points of a second. … Because of this system design they could not handle the situation correctly yesterday, that they admit.

Since then, the IFE has decided to do something to commemorate A-lam’s ordeal (and, I guess, the fact that she was robbed!)

The International Fencing Federation said in a statement the medal would be awarded for her “aspiration to win and respect for the rules.”

I just think the whole story is really gut-wrenching. Imagine watching the clock be changed then sitting crying in front of 8,000 people, with everyone insisting you’re a loser. Brave woman!

One controversy of these Olympics involved online social networking, and an abusive twitter message sent to Great Britain diver Tom Daley. Reportedly Daley has said that his dad, who passed away due to a brain tumour last year, “gave me all the inspiration that I’ve needed”.

I’m doing it for myself and my dad. It was both our dreams from a very young age.

Unfortunately Tom and partner Peter Waterfield just missed out on a medal with a fourth-place finish in their 10m synchronised diving event. Afterwards twitter user Reece Messer posted a malicious message, taunting Tom about being a disappointment to his father.

Apparently he also threatened to drown Tom and sent other abusive messages. 17-year-old Reece was later arrested after a complaint from a member of the public, invoking much controversy about “free speech” and whether the police should have the power to “censor” online communication.

A technological gaffe has also sparked international controversy at the Games: when North Korea played football against Colombia in Scotland the pre-game graphics showed the South Korean flag next to the players’ name and photograph. The players walked off the pitch and the game was delayed for over an hour.

It’s kind of like someone said “What’s the worst that could happen?”…

A slightly less serious incident was the nude snow angel performed by a man during the men’s cycling road race.  Following the cyclists, helicopters filming the race also caught the apparently naked man lying on a roof alongside the track making an invisible snow angel.

Reviews of the footage reveal the man was actually wearing a pair of speedos and lying on a New Zealand flag – that’s right, he’s a kiwi! What a proud moment for us all. 29-year-old Nick McAvoy has lived in London for a couple of years, and according to his father,

his son had seen the helicopters hover over his Fulham flat before, so thought he’d give them something to look at when he heard them approaching again on Saturday.

Naturally. Go NZ!


Show your colours!

Unlike four years ago for the Beijing Olympics, a couple of nights ago I got to watch the London Opening Ceremony. One of the highlights was the Parade of Nations and it was really fun watching representatives from each country enter the stadium for the first time.

The teams enter the stadium in alphabetical order with Greece (home of the Olympics) at the front and Great Britain (host nation) coming in last. It’s so interesting to see how each team represents itself as far as uniform goes. There’s so much variety but I’m going to say right now that the delegation from Burundi was definitely my fave, so beautiful!

I really like the idea of uniforms inspired by your country’s flag – what could be more patriotic! But you’ve got to have a suitable flag. I don’t think a uniform inspired by the U.S. flag, for example, could be overly literal (that’d be a lot of stars and stripes!). Same goes for NZ really and we usually wear our black and fern anyway – if we wore uniforms inspired by our official flag we’d look like Australians!

Two teams who wore great uniforms inspired by their flag were South Africa and Trinidad and Tobago.

I also really enjoy seeing the native or national dress of different countries, especially when the athletes themselves look really excited and overjoyed to be wearing them. Some of my favourites in this year’s ceremony were

The Cook Islands:




In some delegations the women really shone with beautiful dresses that were really stunning. As I mentioned, I loved the Burundian women’s flowing dresses and other standouts were the sole female competitor from Oman, 100m sprinter Al-Habsi Shinoona Salah in an amazing blue and gold outfit, and the Qatari women including their flagbearer, rifle shooter Al-Hamad Bahiya Mansour.

Other countries chose to have their flagbearer in special garb. Some of these were really impressive, including




The prize for the team with the best sense of humour would have to go to the Czech Republic, who came ready for the notorious English summer with gumboots and brollies.

Many of the countries’ uniforms were really forgettable. Some were plain ugly. The uniforms that I disliked the most were not the Paraguayans with their plunge-necked mini dresses and yankee big band/gondolier uniforms. Not even one of the boring beige brigades. No, the worst by far were the German team’s, whose designer obviously was brought up in a household with very strictly defined gender roles. Girls = Pink, Boys = Blue.

It looks like they’re going to a baby shower for twins. (Or, as I’ve read on a few different webpages, like they’re in a tampon commercial)

But hey. I’m sure some people think that having an almost all black uniform is really dull. While those of us from The Land of the Long White Cloud feel a quickening of the pulse and a lump in our throat when we see our Olympians in their silver ferns (and the Southern Cross on the shoulder is really nice, too).

I will say that our athletes do look a lot more casual than most of the teams, which while very kiwi, is also perhaps a bit of a shame. (Although they do look like the team most ready to play sport!) Our team does have a more formal uniform that was unveiled before the Games and which athletes Nick Willis, Alexis Pritchard and Richard Patterson wore when they met the Queen yesterday.

Maybe it’s a good thing our team didn’t wear them to the opening ceremony, though. They do look a bit like Air New Zealand cabin crew.

For the first time I got to sit down and watch the Olympic opening ceremony. It was choreographed by Danny Boyle. Here’s what I thought.

The Best Bits:

The portrayal of idyllic pastoral England. It’s nice to know their ideal view of themselves is so similar to my ideal view of their country. It gives me hope that one day if I can travel there perhaps I’ll find glimpses of it.

The industrial revolution. I thought it was interesting the way they portrayed this part of their history; it was really incredible watching the black dirt and machinery take over the countryside, the green disappearing before your eyes.  They didn’t try to sugarcoat it too much, although the multicultural aspect was an insight into how it might have been rather than reality.

Physically, it was the most incredible scene change ever! Watching the chimneys rise was really cool. And it was clever the way they showed that the revolution was driven by a small, wealthy part of society at the expensive of the lower classes who did all the work.

One of my favourite bits was the iron smelter and the forging of the fifth ring. As a spectacle it was just so impressive and astonishing.

As it rose it still looked like red-hot, newly forged metal. Cool! And when it joined the other four rings and they rained sparks: iconic!

Use of English literature and literary figures. Kenneth Branagh dressed as Abe Lincoln (kidding!) is all good, but Voldemort and the Child Catcher stole the show. I fell in love with books and reading as a kid and so many of the books I read were British (even though I may not have realised at the time).

The illuminated beds of the children looked great and the towering, billowing Voldemort was terrifying; his wand shooting out magic was an inspired touch. The Mary Poppinses did really well – very composed on their high wires.

Inclusion of various social movements in British history. Including new immigrants and the suffragettes with their signs and sashes.

Rowan Atkinson as Mr. Bean. A really clever piece with him and the Symphony Orchestra.

The volunteers! They did so well being coordinated and in character the whole time. In particular the drummers who keep it up for the whole Parade of Nations. Legends!

The Olympic Cauldron. Made up of 204 petals which formed a flaming flower, part of the delight of the spectators, I’m sure, was relief at finally understanding what those bronze conch-shaped things were that entered with each country.

Having the cauldron lit as individual flames representing each country by a group of young athletes was a cool idea. Watching the petals rise into the Olympic Cauldron was really clever.

Other cool things included the children’s signing choir for the deaf (although since they didn’t show them that much I’m not totally sure how efficient their signing was) and be-suited David Beckham in the speedboat (although the beautiful  young torchbearer in the bow kind of stole the show).

Overall the practically seamless choreography of the whole thing was really impressive. The way each vignette was obviously planned and storyboarded, the characters and camera angles each cinematologically deliberate.

But my very favourite part – can you guess? Clue: I love trees, sunshine, rolling hills and long grass. The grassy hill, criss-crossed by paths and covered in long waving grasses with little flowers, lit up by yellow lights so as people walked across it the close-ups looked like they were walking through a sunlit field. Really beautiful.

A CNN guide to the ceremony suggests the hill is reminiscent of Glastonbury Tor, a hill with associations with King Arthur, Avalon, and Jesus. Watching each person walk up the hill I was quite jealous – it looks like such a fun place to play! The tree atop the hill reminds me of a famous scene from Winnie-the-Pooh. Or maybe the Party Tree?



And then there were

The Weird Bits:

The giant baby. I missed the part where its relevance was shown. It looked like a huge bluish baby corpse with gashes in its head and a strange, rippling ghost body.

Zombie apocalypse? The whole industrial revolution thing was really well done, not just in terms of the scenery but with the happy, clean, carefree people gamboling about being replaced with dirty, downtrodden workers toiling away. But the fact that they came out from a dark misty cave beneath the hilltop tree and kind of staggered down to take over the landscape did make it look like a nineteenth century zombie apocalypse.

Mixed messages. I thought it was a nice touch having the “VIP” flagbearers carrying the official Olympic flag. Wearing white, presumably for peace and purity and whatnot, the bearers included “Angel of Mostar” Sally Becker, environmentalist Marina Silva, Nobel Peace Prize winner Leymah Gbowee and the director of ‘Liberty’ (a British civil liberties advocacy organisation), Shami Chakrabarti. These leaders of peace and unity then handed the Olympic flag over to uniformed military representatives of the British navy, army and air force. Incongruous, I think is the right word.

Her Majesty is not amused. Tipped to be the next internet meme, having celebrated her Diamond Jubilee this year Queen Elizabeth II seems to feel that after 60 years she doesn’t need to pretend to be amused anymore. Fair enough. But maybe just crack a smile?

Democracy – apparently it doesn’t mean what I think it means. I was a bit confused when North Korea entered in the Parade of Nations and their official name was “Democratic People’s Republic of North Korea”. Democratic? Really?


No Tolkien. It was great how they used the work Shakespeare, J.M. Barrie and J.K. Rowling in the ceremony, but where was J.R.R. Tolkien? The answer is: everywhere. The whole theme of the industrial revolution was so important to Tolkien and so informed his work that the first part of the opening ceremony was pretty much a retelling of one of his most famous books (including the forging of the ring :p). I’m surprised that they didn’t mention him overtly at all, even if they (presumably) couldn’t put in a Tower of Barad-dûr behind Voldemort and the Child Catcher for copyright reasons.


But even more than these, the bit I found the weirdest was those crazy national signs carried by the women in face dresses. As reader “CrossWC” wrote on the Washington Post site,

They look like they are suffering from some horrific neck injury and are wearing some sort of diabolical Halo neck brace device.

It’s so true! What’s up with that? Why can’t they just carry the names on a single pole? Those weird metal apparatuses are so distracting! And weird. Weird shoes, weird dresses, weird signs. But lovely smiles 😀


Despite this I did enjoy watching the Parade of Nations – more on that later…

I recently learned about an artist who uses unique techniques and processes to create beautiful artworks. Tim Knowles is a UK artist who uses natural phenomenon like wind and terrain to create sketches and media installations.

“Tree Drawing – Hawthorn on Easel” by Tim Knowles

Myself, I have always been inspired by the idea of contact and touching; touching an item or standing in a place that someone else had touched or stood – I feel like that can give a powerful connection through time and space. It’s why I took the in-progress pieces of my Rainbow Warrior quilt to the Rainbow Warrior memorial in Matauri Bay and her masts in Dargaville. To know that my quilt – inspired by that ship, her crew and what she represents – has actually touched parts of the ship herself, has been out in the sunshine, sea air and
waving grass, makes the quilt all the more special to me. It feels imbued with the spirit of those places.

Largely through my studies at university the idea of agency has really taken hold inside me, as well. In humanities we use “agency” to describe the ability to act (independently), and you could say, to exert power; it’s the opposite of inert passivity. In particular the realisation that human animals are not the only ones who have agency really changed the way I think about many things. Nonhuman animals obviously (to me) have agency; a bird may choose
where to fly, what to eat, when to return home, how to react to situations she encounters. But it was also a realisation to me to think about the agency of other living things on the planet, like trees. A trees responds to the sun, to water and some have even been shown to “communicate” and share information about predators, etc.

The work of Tim Knowles’ that I have read about online really taps into this part of me that is aware of the world outside human control. (This is not to say that we cannot control it – we can and do. But when left alone, many other beings in the world are allowed to exert their own agency). Tim’s past works have included his “Windwalks”, drawings made by attaching a sail/windvane-like apparatus to his head and going for walks through early-morning London directed only by the changing winds and breezes. Afterwards GPS tracking was used to plot these journeys as prints that Colby Chamberlain describes as “a Surrealist experiment in automatic drawing”.

Tim Knowles’ “Windwalks – Five Walks From Charing Cross”

I really like the way Gabrielle Hoad describes Tim’s unique approach to his art

In the past, Tim Knowles has been a hands-off artist, setting in motion unpredictable mark-making processes. He’s allowed everything from helium balloons and trees to postal packages and cars to drawn their own movements: “making the invisible visible” as he puts it. There’s much to be said for John Cage’s view that the world is more fascinating when we let it be itself.

On Tim’s website there are images from many of his exhibitions, all with mysterious and exciting names like “Full Moon Reflections” (photographs of reflections of the full moon on different bodies of non-still water), “Windwalks” (prints delineating wind-directed walks as described above) and “Nightwalks” (photographs taken with a very long exposure as the artist walks away from the camera through the landscape carrying powerful torches which illuminate his path). What amazing ways of encountering the world and, in case of the walks, of portraying an individual’s attempt to literally make one’s way.

I found each of these ideas really exciting but the works which really drew me to Tim as an artist were his Tree Drawings – drawings not of trees, but by trees. In Cabinet magazine, Tim explains his execution of the prints:

I attach artists’ sketching pens to their branches and then place sheets of paper in such a way that the trees’ natural motions—as well as their moments of stillness—are recorded. Like signatures, each drawing reveals something about the different qualities and characteristics of the various trees as they sway in the breeze: the relaxed, fluid line of an oak; the delicate, tentative touch of a larch; a hawthorn’s stiff, slightly neurotic scratches.

I love the appreciation Tim has of the characteristics of each different tree. This appreciation really comes through in how the reality of their unique individuality is present in each artwork. Although Tim Knowles is the artist his role here is as a fascilitator for the expression of the wind and the branches.

I’ve never been to a Tim Knowles exhibition but I’ve seen online that each piece is presented as a “diptych” (a fancy way of saying two pieces of artwork together), the drawing itself together with a photograph of it being created. He even used a video of the work being created in one of his exhibitions, projected onto the wall next to the print itself. There’s a great video from MassArt (Massachusetts College of Art and Design) which has Tim Knowles talking about both the process of creating the Tree Drawings and the method of exhibition – watch it on YouTube. In the same article as above, Tim states

Process is key to my work, so each Tree Drawing is accompanied by a photograph or video documenting the location and manner of its creation.

I really think this is inspired. For me it presents two ways of seeing a single moment in time and forms a connection between different ways of experiencing. The author of a Saatchi Gallery online editorial sees in Tim’s Tree Drawings the accomplishment of a long-held goal in English artistic tradition. Of Tree Drawing – Scots Pine, Buttermere Shore #1 (2005), it notes

Given its Cumbrian context, the unforced lyricism of Knowles’s approach stands in ironic historical juxtaposition to the plein-air labours of English landscape painters, who for centuries have strived to capture the agitation of a swaying tree. Knowles achieves their long-held ambition by the simple fact of enabling the tree to record its own unrest.

The idea of “enabling” a tree is a beautiful one. I really adore the resulting works Tim has created. While these are my favourite of his pieces so far, it is fascinating to read about the ways in which he has created many other works with the use of all sorts of natural and human-made phenomena. I urge you to visit Tim’s site and look through his various artworks. For me the image of a tree drawing on an easel in particular is a very powerful one.

And if I ever get the chance to visit an exhibition of his, I shall jump at it.

“Oak on Easel #1” by Tim Knowles

Mobile telephone network ‘2degrees’ launched in New Zealand three years ago with kiwi comedian Rhys Darby as the face of the brand. It was probably the best decision they could have made. In 2012 his ads are still going strong and still hilarious.

Lots of people know Rhys from his role in the Flight of the Conchords’ series on HBO. Like in his stand-up, FotC character Murray Hewitt uses a great high-pitched New Zealand accent as he makes jokes about kiwis and the NZ way of life. If it ain’t broke, don’t fix it – and Rhys sticks to his winning formula in the ads for 2degrees, which feature him as an hilariously oddball (yet somehow “everyman”) kiwi bloke. Like Murray, his 2degrees persona is wacky, lovable and clueless.

2degrees wants to keep New Zealand talking, so get off your MyFace and FriendBook pages, stop twatter-bleeping, and have a good old-fashioned chinwag. For free!

The ads featuring Rhys show him in a various of NZ situations but always with a (totally mental) twist. Even the animated ads for mobile plans for which Rhys provides the voice-over typically take a turn for the ridiculous. Like the “Pay Monthly” ad featuring small business owners Ben and Bernie, which ends with 2degrees customer Ben throwing a staff party and Bernie running off to join the French foreign legion.

C’mon, Bernie – five years and you’ll get a beret. Sacrebleu!

I really like the Christmas ads each year (though the one with the detachable arms was pretty weird), especially the one featuring Rhys in his knitted jumper with a kiwi on his lap and his pronunciation of “the original name for NZ” in the language of the native wood pigeon.

Like an old lady’s slipper – with a beak

My favourite ad to date has to be the one with the joke about Cambridge. It just highlights the fact that we’re laughing at ourselves – but really we still know we’re the best in the world :p

With 2degrees you can stay close to your mates for only 44c a minute. Whether they’re in Cambridge England, Cambridge Australia, or actual Cambridge, here in New Zealand.

I was reminded once again of Rhys’ genius when I went to see The Dark Knight Rises and the pre-show “cellphones off” message came courtesy of 2degrees.

Aaaah… you’re at the movies. It’s time to relax. Imagine you’re a bear, hibernating in a cosy cave. You’ve slowed your heart rate down to one beat per year. Every year you sleep you get older, but you look younger. Because you’re a wise young bear who’s moisturised long before you’ve needed to.


…just, what?? Love, love, love. And to top it all off, a reference to every kiwi kid’s fave movie lollies:

Alright, wake up now, bear! You’ve dropped your Tangy Fruits pottle!

Oh Rhys, how you made me yearn for a plastic pottle of Tangy Fruits!

If you’d like to watch some of Rhys’ ads for 2degrees you can find them on their YouTube channel.

50/50 (2011)

I almost didn’t rent this movie because it’s got Seth Rogen in it. No offense to him, it’s just that his type of movies aren’t usually my type of movies. When I saw him on the cover, despite the glorious presence of Joseph Gordon-Levitt, I worried it might be one of those druggie/party movies that every seems to love (but me)

50/50 is about Adam, a radio writer whose girlfriend Rachel stays with him most nights. He also likes hanging out with his best friend Kyle who often gives him a ride to work since Adam can’t drive. I like Adam ‘cos he’s quite quiet and chilled out and like me he doesn’t smoke, drink or drive.

One day he goes to the doctor about a recurring backache and the doctor tells him he’s got schwannoma neurofibrosarcoma. Adam’s reaction is just what you’d expect “So sorry… I don’t know what that is”. The doctor tells him it’s cancer, and after that Adam doesn’t hear anything else he says.

That doesn’t make any sense, though. I don’t smoke. I don’t drink. …I recycle…

The impersonal, impassionate way the doctor delivers the news is so abrupt. He’s really uncomfortable when he thinks he detects Adam’s emotional reaction and quickly tells him about the hospital’s counselling services, which Adam eventually makes use of in the form of cute young psychiatry student,
Katherine. The rest of the film follows his live in the aftermath of his “50/50” diagnosis.

This film does a great job of showing how cancer affects not only the patient but also the other people in his or her life and the unexpected star of the show – yup, I’m gunna say it: Seth Rogen. Joseph totally deserved his Oscar nomination for this – he was crazy-awesome – but watching someone as they’re
diagnosed with a serious form of cancer and undergo treatment is really intense and kind of exhausting. Kyle’s irreverent humour is the perfect foil for the dark hopelessness of what Adam’s experiencing. He’s a really good friend. He drives Adam to his hospital appointments but he also persuades him to use his cancer to pick up chicks. I’ve said it before and I’ll say it again: there aren’t enough positive male  relationships in movies, but I think this is one.

This film is definitely one of my top two cancer movies of all time. That’s right, it’s right up there with Wit.

The back of the DVD case (which I didn’t read ’til after the movie, thank goodness) calls the film a “laugh-out-loud comedy” and both its Oscar nominations (best movie and best actor) were in the ‘Comedy or Musical’ category. That’s messed up. I mean, sure, I LOLed. But I don’t think that makes it a comedy. I also cried. I think it’s more of a “drama”, myself. But what do I know? I haven’t had cancer.

If you think this sounds like your kinda movie, I highly recommend getting it on your next trip to the DVD rental store. But I do not recommend reading the back of the DVD case, it totally gives away the ending.

Director: Jonathan Levine
Writer: Will Reiser
Starring: Joseph Gordon-Levitt, Seth Rogen, Anna Kendrick